From Main Street to Wall Street: A Resident’s Perspective on Inequality in America
America, once a beacon of “can-do” spirit and exceptionalism, now finds itself facing unprecedented social divisions reminiscent of past upheavals. The rise of hyper-partisanship has given way to increased racism, nationalism, and various forms of discrimination, further fracturing the nation. Beneath these surface tensions lie deep-rooted economic disparities—vertical and horizontal inequality—that exacerbate feelings of anxiety, distrust, and resentment among citizens. To truly regain its exceptional status, America needs a comprehensive strategy to address both dimensions of economic inequality.
Vertical inequality, evident in large cities, highlights extremes of wealth and poverty in close proximity. On the other hand, horizontal inequality emphasizes the differences in wealth, income, and growth between urban centers and the Heartland, where agriculture and manufacturing have been in decline. Both dimensions contribute to the socio-economic rifts that plague the nation.
Democrats focus on vertical inequality, while Republicans pay more attention to the horizontal, particularly the economic challenges faced by the Heartland. The failure to address both dimensions contributed to the hyper-partisan gridlock in Washington.
To bridge this economic divide, a national strategy addressing both vertical and horizontal inequality is crucial. Such a strategy must appeal to voters across party lines and unite the nation around plans for inclusive economic growth.
Political progressives propose measures such as increasing tax progressivity, raising the minimum wage, and guaranteeing basic needs. Taxing the rich, expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit, and supporting essential needs could address the disparities between high earners and the economically insecure.
Horizontal inequality requires a collaborative effort between federal, state, and local governments to prioritize investments in struggling regions. Proposals like Opportunity Zones fall short, and a more comprehensive approach is needed to create better-paying jobs in areas still awaiting economic recovery.
Successful regional economic development efforts across the country demonstrate the potential for collaboration between political parties, businesses, and labor groups. Cities like Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and Nashville serve as examples of how local leaders can develop strategies for education, innovation, infrastructure, and community well-being.
A national economic strategy should emphasize investments in education, innovation, infrastructure, and healthy communities. Prioritizing comprehensive, collaborative efforts can ensure success in developing better-paying jobs and improving overall economic security.
Raising this regional economic development strategy to the national level requires strengthening federal support for local initiatives, using federal resources to encourage collaboration, and adopting strategic economic planning for global competitiveness in emerging industries.
The election provides an opportunity to elect leaders with the vision to address both vertical and horizontal inequality, healing a divided nation. A new economic strategy combining “people-based” and “place-based” policies is essential for inclusiveness and opportunity, ensuring that no American is left behind. As we move forward, let us strive to be truly united states, breaking down economic barriers and fostering a nation that thrives together.
Sources:
- https://youtu.be/-gU2pNL4NTc?si=5_uQrdptWHiodXS_
- https://www.brookings.edu/articles/to-unite-a-divided-nation-we-must-tackle-both-vertical-and-horizontal-inequality/
- https://chat.openai.com/
- https://readloud.net/
About Author
